Roger Ver: Bitcoin Wrapped on Ethereum Proves Lightning Network a ‘Total Failure’

Share Article
In Brief
  • Roger Ver claims the Lightning Network is a 'total failure.'

  • Bitcoin tokenized on Ethereum surges to $1.3 billion.

  • DeFi is likely the biggest driving factor, not scaling.

  • promo

    KuCoin Releases KCS whitepaper – a Path for Geek to Mass Adoption Read now!

The Trust Project is an international consortium of news organizations building standards of transparency.

Bitcoin Cash proponent Roger Ver stirred up a bit of controversy saying that the recent surge in Wrapped Bitcoin on Ethereum is proof that the Lightning Network (LN) has been a ‘total failure’ as a scaling solution.

There is now almost $1.3 billion in Bitcoin tokenized for use on the Ethereum network.

According to BTConEthereum, there are currently over 118,000 bitcoins worth approximately $1.3 billion tokenized on the Ethereum network. The majority of that, almost a billion dollars worth, is in the form of wrapped Bitcoin (wBTC).

The chart has gone parabolic over the past two months as new DeFi yield farming opportunities have presented themselves on an almost daily basis.

Comparatively, Bitcoin’s primary scaling solution, the Lightning Network, has not seen the same uptake. According to a recent Twitter post by Roger Ver, the Lightning Network has almost 100 times less BTC in use on it:

As expected, the post generated heated responses from Bitcoin maximalists, Ethereum evangelists, and altcoin aficionados touting rival blockchains. There were very few who actually agreed with Ver, and that might be because it isn’t a very good comparison.

The surge in wrapped Bitcoin this year has been primarily driven by DeFi yield farming, which has very little to do with scaling the asset.

BTC holders wanting to gain access to liquidity mining and other DeFi features without selling their Bitcoin bags can tokenize the asset, and wBTC provides a simple method to do this.

Lightning Network Square Crypto BitcoinThe Lightning Network was designed to facilitate micropayments in Bitcoin between parties that have created their own channels to do so. It does that function well, but the fact that there are far fewer participants using BTC on LN does not mean it has failed. On the contrary, this suggests that more people are holding the asset, or reinvesting it into DeFi, rather than using it for payments.

Some respondents amusingly commented that there is no Bitcoin Cash tokenized on Ethereum indicating that BCH has been a ‘total failure.’

Others pointed out that neither BTC nor BCH are suitable for payments yet due to massive volatility in prices. BCH, for example, was ‘flipped’ over the past weekend by Chainlink in the market cap charts, taking the fifth spot with a 6% gain.

The comparison, whether justified or not, does prove that crypto tribalism is still alive and kicking.


All the information contained on our website is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. Any action the reader takes upon the information found on our website is strictly at their own risk.
Share Article

Martin has been covering the latest developments on cyber security and infotech for two decades. He has previous trading experience and has been actively covering the blockchain and crypto industry since 2017.

Follow Author

KuCoin Releases KCS whitepaper – a Path for Geek to Mass Adoption      

Read now Startup – Leading Blockchain Project Discount Platform for Startups

Read now

Olympus, a P2E NFT Game Similar to Clash Royale, Is Making Headlines

Read Now