See More

Mirror Trading CEO to Pay Record $1.7 Billion Restitution for Crypto Scam

2 mins
Updated by Michael Washburn
Join our Trading Community on Telegram

In Brief

  • A South African firm and its CEO are under orders from a US court to pay $1.7 billion for running a Bitcoin scam.
  • The scam promised significant gains through a commodity pool as well as a non-existent trading bot.
  • The civil penalty is the highest ever ordered by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
  • promo

On September 6, Judge David A. Ezra issued a consent order against Mirror Trading International (MTI), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced the following day.

The court found MTI guilty of forex fraud, commodity pool operator fraud, registration violations, and regulatory non-compliance. The case has gained notoriety as South Africa’s biggest-ever pyramid scheme.

Mirror Trading International Will Pay a Record Civil Monetary Penalty

The judge’s September 7 consent order, a court-approved agreement between two disputing parties, brings the long-running case to its conclusion.

Back on April 24, the Western District of Texas US District Court issued a default judgment against Cornelius Johannes Steynberg, MTI’s founder and CEO. Both orders stem from a CFTC complaint filed on June 30, 2022.

Authorities accused the business and its CEO, Cornelius Johannes Steynberg, of large-scale fraud involving Bitcoin. MTI operated a scam commodity pool that promised victims significant gains for pooling their assets.

Cornelius Johannes Steynberg, CEO of Mirror Trading International.
Steynberg will pay a record-breaking penalty to relieve his victims. Source: Facebook / IRS Investigators

The fraud managed to ensnare at least 23,000 victims, according to the CFTC. In total, MIT collected over 29,421 BTC, worth over $760 million at today’s prices. 

However, at the end of the relevant period, the cryptocurrency was worth even more: a whopping $1.7 billion. Unfortunately, the defendants misappropriated every single bitcoin (BTC) that they accepted from the pool participants.

As a result, Judge Ezra has ordered MTI and Steynberg to pay over $1.7 billion in restitution to the victims. The penalty is the highest civil monetary penalty ordered by the CFTC.

Legitimate commodity pools operate like a group investment fund where individuals agree to gather their assets for financial gain. In the case of MTI, victims were promised huge wins with a trading bot that would make investments on their behalf. However, the trading bot did not exist.

Did you know your Bitcoin transactions aren’t actually anonymous? Anonymity vs. Pseudonymity: Understanding the Key Differences

Criminals Often Chose Bitcoin for Its Pseudonymity

“The fraudsters made the most modern of promises, claiming their ‘Advanced Intelligence Software with Bitcoin as the base currency’ would create untold wealth for investors, but were actually committing a classic form of fraud, a multilevel marketing scam,” said CFTC Director of Enforcement Ian McGinley.

Criminals often favor cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. They exploit its pseudonymity, which allows them to conduct transactions without directly revealing their true identities. This can make it easier to hide ill-gotten gains.

Unlike complete anonymity, where actions are untraceable, pseudonymity links transactions to a digital alias. However, this digital alias can in some cases be traced back to the individual with enough data and effort.

Top crypto projects in the US | May 2024

Trusted

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

Frame-2298.png
Josh Adams
Josh is a reporter at BeInCrypto. He first worked as a journalist over a decade ago, initially covering music before moving into politics and current affairs. Josh first owned Bitcoin in 2014 and has followed the space ever since. He is particularly interested in Web3 adoption, policy and regulation, CBDCs, privacy, and the future of the metaverse.
READ FULL BIO
Sponsored
Sponsored