OneCoin Court Case: UK Judge Agrees to Extradite Christopher Hamilton

31 August 2022, 12:45 GMT+0000
Updated by Robert D Knight
1 September 2022, 16:14 GMT+0000
In Brief
  • Legal action against OneCoin and its profiteers continues to gather pace.
  • A U.K. judge approved an extradition request from the U.S. for Christopher Hamilton.
  • Hamilton is alleged to have laundered up to $105 million along with his accomplice Robert McDonald.
  • promo

    Invest and Seaside Club Will Do the Rest Read Now

Legal action against OneCoin took a major step forward when a U.K. judge agreed that Christopher Hamilton, a major player in the international Ponzi scheme, could be extradited to the U.S.

While Hamilton can now look forward to some international travel at the taxpayer’s expense, his co-defendant, Robert McDonald, will not be joining him.

Judge Nicholas Rimmer denied extradition for McDonald on the grounds of respect for family life. McDonald’s wife, for whom he cares for, suffers from progressive multiple sclerosis.

OneCoin problems

OneCoin is arguably one of the cryptosphere’s highest profile scams, estimated to have swindled participants out of $4 billion. Its leader, Ruja Ignatova, the self-styled “Crypto Queen” remains at large and is on Interpol’s most wanted list.

While authorities have been unable to track down the Queen of OneCoin, others among OneCoin’s aristocracy have been decidedly easier to track down. Among them are Hamilton and McDonald.

Hamilton and McDonald together are accused of laundering up to $105 million for the multi-level marketing (MLM) scam. According to the extradition request, a Florida financier named Gilbert Armenta paid millions of dollars to an entity called Viola Asset Management.

This entity was run by Hamilton, with help from McDonald, who acted as the company’s compliance officer. As well as laundering funds for Armenta, who has been described by U.S. federal prosecutors as a “professional money launderer,” Hamilton and McDonald are accused of stealing a further $32 million from their U.S. counterpart. 

/Related

More Articles

Where the damage was done

Lawyers representing Hamilton and McDonald argued that extradition for the men was inappropriate since alleged wrongdoing and harm was largely based in the U.K. For this reason, the appropriate jurisdiction was England.

That argument did not sit well with District Judge Nicholas Rimmer. Judge Rimmer noted that the U.K. police had abandoned their investigation of OneCoin in 2019, and on that basis any prosecution in the country was highly unlikely.

“Wherever victims are based, it is in their interests for perpetrators involved to be prosecuted rather than not to be,” Judge Rimmer wrote as reported by Law360. “This factor weighs in favor of extradition.”

Furthermore, the opportunity to prosecute the men in the company of their fellow co-accused made the extradition even more desirable. The two men now have the right to appeal the decision. 

The search for Ruja Ignatova continues.

Disclaimer

The information provided in independent research represents the author's view and does not constitute investment, trading, or financial advice. BeinCrypto doesn’t recommend buying, selling, trading, holding, or investing in any cryptocurrencies