BeInNews Academy Ltd © Street: Suite 1701 – 02A, 17/F, 625 King’s Road, North Point. Hong Kong.
Litecoin is the “digital silver” of cryptocurrency—or at least that’s what we’ve heard. It modeled after Proof of work and proof of stake are both ways of achieving trustless and distributed consensus on the blockchain. Many... More consensus algorithm.—”digital gold”—but with an amended
In addition, the Litecoin Foundation has engaged in numerous partnerships and sponsorships to promote the cryptocurrency. Members have even discussed integrating the Mimblewimble Privacy protocol into the coin. This would cause massive differentiation from Bitcoin.
What the future holds for Litecoin may not entirely be clear, but its price has been steadily increasing since Dec 2018.
Will these gains hold or is a crash going to bring the price of Litecoin back to previous lows?
LTC reached a high of almost $79.5 on May 1. It has been decreasing since, trading inside the symmetrical triangle we have outlined below:
At the time of writing, the price was trading very close to the resistance line of the triangle.
Based on our latest analysis, LTC/USD may decrease and break down from the triangle. It is likely to reach the support area near $74.5.
To read our full Apr 25 analysis of LTC/USD and LTC/EUR, click on the green button below:
Litecoin (LTC) is a peer-to-peer digital currency and open-source software project which designed after Bitcoin (BTC).
. In fact, if bitcoin is ‘digital gold,’ Litecoin fashions itself as ‘digital silver’ — and largely piggybacks on everything Bitcoin does. This fact is both Litecoin’s greatest strength and its greatest weakness.
In late Jan and early Feb 2019, members of the Litecoin Foundation made statements about adding enhanced privacy features to LTC. First, Charlie Lee announced his intention to add confidential transactions to the LTC blockchain on Jan 28, 2019. Franklyn Richards furthered the discussion and added that the Foundation was looking to integrate the Mimblewimble protocol into LTC using a soft fork.
Mimblewimble integrates both confidential transaction and CoinJoin innovations to encrypt transaction amounts and their sources. It enables the buyer and seller to remain more anonymous. If Mimblewimble were integrated, the fungibility, privacy, and scalability of LTC could greatly increase while avoiding the contentions of a hard fork. Furthermore, it would add significant market differentiation to the cryptocurrency. Currently, Beam (BEAM) and Grin (GRIN) are the only two coins to use Mimbelwimble.
In Aug 2019, LTC is expected to undergo its second halving. This means that the miner’s reward will be cut in half from 25 litecoins to just 12.5. This could disincentivize miners to continue mining. In order for miners to continue earning at their current rate, the value of LTC will have to double or transaction fees must significantly increase. An increase in transaction fees may disincentivize the use of LTC. The building of sponsorships and partnerships with organizations like TokenPay, Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), Mammoth Film Festival, and others may, however, increase the value of LTC and, thus, the miner’s reward.”
If you could send me the final edition after revisions or edits so I have the word count, it would be greatly appreciated.
Like its big brother, Bitcoin, Litecoin supports the soft-fork change in transaction format called Segregated Witness — more commonly known as Segwit. The upgrade continues to become more widely adopted as time progresses, and is an example of how Litecoin benefits from having the same core technology like Bitcoin.
Just as Litecoin supports Segwit, it also supports the highly-anticipated second-layer payment protocol called The If you've been paying any attention to Bitcoin in the last few years, you have undoubtedly heard the term "Lightning... More.
The Lightning Network plans to enable lightning-fast micropayments between participating nodes and is quickly becoming a viable solution to Bitcoin’s scaleability concerns — at least for small payments. The Lightning Network is less notably connected to Litecoin, but it is important to note that a successful Lightning Network is not only good for BTC but also LTC.
Litecoin (LTC) is exchanged on virtually every cryptocurrency exchange under the sun, and cryptocurrency traders would be hard-pressed to find a reliable exchange which doesn’t support the seventh-ranked cryptocurrency.
Litecoin’s current 24-hour trading volume across tracked exchanges is $375,810,001 USD, according to CoinMarketCap.com.
Litecoin can be stored on most of the most popular hardware wallets, including the CoolWallet S, Opendime, LedgerS, Trezor, KeepKey, and BitBox.
Investors, traders, and When traders think about cryptocurrencies, they focus more on how they can profit from the price swings. But, what happens... More of Litecoin should have no problem finding storing solutions and trading platforms for their LTC.
Litecoin was created by former Google and Coinbase employee Charlie Lee.
Lee famously sold all of his Litecoin at the very top of the cryptocurrency bubble, when LTC was at its all-time high. The creator cited a conflict of interest as the primary reason for selling his stockpile of the cryptocurrency.
Not everyone is convinced that Lee sold his Litecoins for benevolent reasons — especially given the fact that he sold at the very top and undoubtedly earned a sizeable profit.
Prominent silver bull and YouTuber ‘TruthNever Told’ believes Charlie Lee’s Litecoin sale was little more than cashing out of a Ponzi scheme, in which the creator created a rip-off of Bitcoin with no intrinsic value, convinced investors that it was valuable, and then cashed out at the top. While his argument is persuasive, it is worth noting that the YouTuber in question believes all cryptocurrencies are effectively worthless — and thus his opinion should probably not be factored in too seriously when discussing price predictions and forecasts.
In February 2018, Litecoin (LTC) experienced a strong pump off the news that LitePay — a credit card-like LTC payment solution for vendors — would accelerate adoption of the cryptocurrency in the retail sector.
Those hoping to easily use their LTC at retail vendors were sadly disappointed, however, when the project shut down only one month later. LitePay CEO Kenneth Asare shut down all operations and made preparations to sell the company at the end of March. Since then, the project has gone entirely dormant. At the time of this writing, the official LitePay website displays a simple logo and nothing else.
Charlie Lee himself apologized for hyping up the project. Though mistakes happen and it was good of Lee to apologize, BeInCrypto believes this instance further damaged the creator’s reputation.
Like everyone else, we got too excited about something that was too good to be true and we optimistically overlooked many of the warning signs. I am sorry for having hyped up this company and vow to do better due diligence in the future. https://t.co/khIjeHnyZ1
— Charlie Lee [LTC⚡] (@SatoshiLite) March 26, 2018
LitePay serves as an example of why investors should not buy into the hype and conduct their own due diligence on hype-related developments connected to altcoins.
Perhaps the biggest problem for Litecoin is the fact that Bitcoin still has a much larger market cap and price. Because Litecoin designed itself after Bitcoin, it will have difficulty competing unless it can successfully display differentiation. Furthermore, the differences offered must be desired by end users.
Of course, Litecoin was never designed to compete with Bitcoin. Both coins can exist together. They may develop different uses and audiences. Both could be integrated into distinct industries or communities as currency while another is integrated into other industries and communities.
The lower price tag of one litecoin versus one bitcoin is also somewhat enticing. For the price of one bitcoin, an individual could buy around 70-80 litecoins. In the long-term, should cryptocurrencies succeed to the point where it is legitimately difficult to get ahold of Bitcoins, Litecoin may see success in the retail sector as a more effective means of payment.
In essence, Litecoin could become a more effective cryptocurrency than Bitcoin — but this is uncertain.
On Nov 28, 2013, Litecoin reached a high of $55. A sharp decrease followed and led to new lows in mid-January 2015 of $1.10.
Price rebounded. Within six months, highs of nearly $8.96 were reached.
By early September, prices had dropped. For around two years, LTC traded between $3-$5 before rapid price spikes in late 2017 brought LTC to highs of over $370 in mid-December.
Price has been on a downtrend since. LTC bottomed out on Dec 7, 2018 at $22.50.
Relevant upward trends are listed below with the lows and highs experienced at the respective beginning and end of each:
|TIME FRAMES FOR UPWARD MOVEMENT||LOW (DATE EXPERIENCED)||HIGH (DATE EXPERIENCED)|
|Oct 2, 2013 – Nov 28, 2013||$1.41 (Oct 2, 2013)||$55 (Nov 28, 2013)|
|Jan 14, 2015 – Dec 19, 2017||$1.10 (Jan 14, 2015)||$370.7 (Dec 19, 2018)|
|Dec 7, 2018-?||$22.50 (Dec 7, 2019)||$?.??|
It appears as if we are in the midst of a third significant upward trend based on the significant price increases since the bottom on Dec 7, 2018.
In this analysis, we will predict the date in which the price and date of the next peak. Furthermore, we will assess Litecoin’s potential price at the end of 2019 and 2020 respectively.
To begin, we seek to isolate similarities between these upward trends within the technical indicators. To begin, we examine the similarly low relative strength index (RSI) ratings during each bottom.
The price of LTC on Bitfinex is analyzed at weekly intervals from Jul 2013 to Mar 2019 alongside RSI in order to figure out where our current position is relative to the 2014 correction:
To better visualize large price fluctuations, logarithmic charts are going to be used in this analysis.
The lowest RSI recorded during the 2015 correction was 29. This occurred on the weekly candle for the week of Jan 12-Jan 19, 2015. The $1.10 bottom was also reached during this period.
Similarly, an RSI of 29 was reached during the week of Dec 3-Dec 10, 2018. The $22.50 bottom was reached during this period as well.
This may suggest that RSI may reach similarly low levels of under 30 shortly before LTC bottoms out after a longterm downtrend.
Therefore, we may have the first similarity between the two bottoms: Oversold RSI values(<30) were reached on the weeks which correspond with the Jan 14, 2015 and Dec 7, 2018 bottoms.
The price of LTC on Bitfinex is analyzed at three day-intervals from Jul 2017 to Mar 2019 (top chart) and from Aug 2013 to Jul 2015 (bottom chart).
Now we examine similarities between the 2018 and 2014 corrections based on this data:
On Sep 15, 2017, the price reached a low of $32.40. After 61 days, the price reached a high of $370.70. A sharp decrease ensued, followed by a gradual downtrend ending with the Dec low at $22.50.
The rate of decrease measuring from the $32.50 low to the $22.50 low is 32%.
After the Dec high of $370.70, the price began to gradually decrease. On Jul 18, 2018, the price made a high of $94.40. It continued to create lower highs, alternating between gradual and sharp decreases. Several market cycles were completed, with each high being lower than the previous one. Tracing these highs gives us a descending resistance line (see the graph below).
The resistance line was touched five times in total. Four times before the $22.50 bottom and once after. The second attempt after the bottom was successful, and the price has been increasing since.
On Oct 22, 2013, a low of $1.61 was reached. After 42 days the price reached a high of $55. A sharp decrease followed almost immediately. This decelerated into an overall gradual downtrend that ended with a $1.10 low in January 2015.
Similar to the 2018 correction, the rate of decrease measuring from the $1.61 low is 32%.
After the Dec 2013 high of $55, the price began to gradually decrease. On May 25, 2014, it reached a high of $12. A downtrend followed with periods of both gradual and rapid losses.
Several market cycles were completed, with each high being lower than the previous one. Tracing these highs gives us a descending resistance line (see graph below).
The resistance line was touched five times in total. Four times before and once after the $1.1 bottom. The second attempt after the bottom was successful, and the price has been increasing since.
Now, we have two more similarities:
Despite these similarities, we are examining only two events to try to generate a pattern to predict future prices.
This is an admittedly insufficient data set.
For this reason, our price prediction is meant not only to gauge future price value. It is also meant to assess the validity of the patterns defined herein. If the prices we predict based on the patterns prove true, then the predictions themselves gain validity and may be useable in future analyses.
To determine what prices might be reached, we must determine the time tables during which the patterns we define might unfold. We do this by examining the times of the two corrections:
The price made a high of $55 on Nov 28, 2013. Afterwards, a downtrend followed. It took 415 days for the price to reach the $1.10 low made on Jan 14, 2015.
The price made a high of $370.70 on Dec 17, 2018. Similarly, a downtrend followed. It took 359 days for the price to reach the $22.50 low made on Dec 7, 2018.
Comparing the length of these movements allows us to generate ratios that may help us in determining future prices and when they will be reached.
It took 415 days for the price to move from the high to the bottom during the 2014 crash. During the 2018 crash, this period lasted 359 days. This gives us a rate of 1.155 (415/359)
The price of LTC on Bitfinex is analyzed at weekly intervals from Jul 2013 to Mar 2019 alongside the 20 and 40-week (green & black) moving averages (MA).
During the week of Jul 21-Jul 28, 2014, the 20-week MA crossed below the 40-week MA. This is known as a bearish cross and often indicates that a downtrend has begun. The $1.10 low was reached 175 days later.
During the week of Jun 25-Jul 2, 2018, the 20-week moving average crossed below the 40-week MA. This is known as a bearish cross and often indicates that a downtrend has begun. The $22.50 low was reached 154 days later.
The time it took to reach the bottom measuring from when a bearish cross occurred was 175 and 154 days in the 2014 and 2018 correction respectively.
This gives us a rate of 1.136 (175/154).
Therefore we are going to make the assumption that movements in the 2014 correction take 1.145 longer than the ones in the 2018 correction.
The rate of 1.145 is created by calculating the average of the two rates we have found until now; 1.155 and 1.136.
Since the bullish cross occurred 194 days after the $1.1 bottom, this pattern would gain more validity if a bullish cross were to occur 224 days (194*1.145) after the $22.5 bottom, on Jul 15, 2019.
The price made a low of $1.1 on Jan 14, 2015. An upward move followed that took it to a high of $8.96 on Jul 10, 2015. Measuring from the $1.1 low, we get a rate of increase of 550%.
When measuring the rate of increase, we are using opening and closing prices instead of the actual highs or lows reached during the day, in order to remove outliers which could skew the data in one or the other direction. Furthermore, wick highs and lows can differ from exchange to exchange. Therefore, the actual prices used to measure the rate of increase are $1.18 and $7.56.
Similarly, the price made a low of $22.50 on Dec 17, 2018. Using the same rate of increase and the 1.145 time ratio, we predict that the price will be trading around $124 on May 11, 2019.
In order to figure out the price at the end of 2019, will use the 1.145 rate and apply to the date in the 2014 correction which corresponds to Dec 31, 2019.
On Dec 15, 2015, 333 days after the $1.1 low, the price closed at $3.7. Measuring from the $1.1 low, this is a 203% rate of increase.
Therefore, we will use a 203% increase from the $22.5 low on Dec 17, 2018. This gives us a price of around $70 on Dec 31, 2019.
To predict Litecoin’s price at the end of 2020However, we need to find the price at the end of 2020. In order to do that, we will use the 1.145 ratio to find the date in the 2014 correction which corresponds with Dec 31, 2020.
On Oct 24, 2016, 656 days from the $1.10 low, the price closed at $3.88. Measuring from the low, this is a 224% rate of increase.
Therefore, using the same rate of increase and measuring from the $22.5 low, we arrive at a price of around $76 on Dec 31, 2020.
There are several similarities between the 2014 and 2018 corrections
The following predictions are made with the assumption that price will follow the pattern laid out in the previous correction and on the time tables we defined:
Until these prices are validated, the patterns we define cannot be considered accurate indicators of future prices. Validation of these prices, however, would also validate the accuracy of the pattern we have isolated. At the end of 2019, we will return to these predictions to assess whether the pattern appears to be holding true or not.
[Disclaimer: The contents of this article are not intended as financial advice, and should not be taken as such. BeInCrypto and the author are not responsible for any financial gains or losses made after reading this article. Readers are always encouraged to do their own research before investing in cryptocurrency, as the market is particularly volatile.]
Do you want to Be In Crypto?Join our Telegram Trading Group for FREE Trading Signals,a FREE Trading Course for Beginners and Advanced Tradersand a lot of fun! Images courtesy of Shutterstock, TradingView and Twitter.