FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried has tweeted in defense of Terra ecosystem and its CEO and co-founder, Do Kwon.
In response to a Coindesk article that described Do Kwon as the Elizabeth Holmes of crypto, Bankman-Fried disagreed, stating that “Not all bad things are the same bad thing.”
The comparison between Holmes and Kwon is that both led a project that eventually failed, losing billions. But SBF stated that while LUNA/UST was bad and ended badly, it’s not the same as Holmes’ Theranos failure.
His reasoning is simple; No one is accusing Holmes of Theranos’ failure. She’s facing trial because she lied. Holmes had lied to investors about the capacity of the technology she was developing, but Do Kwon made no such misrepresentations.
According to SBF, LUNA/UST was very transparent, and Do Kwon stood by it despite signs that it could crash. Kwon never lied about the fact that UST was backed by volatile assets and could crash.
In his opinion, SBF believed that it was simply mass enthusiasm and marketing that fueled LUNA’s growth despite clear evidence that it’ll crash. He clarified that while the “marketing was probably bad. It wasn’t the *same* type of bad as Theranos.”
The FTX CEO also pointed out that people losing money on a project doesn’t make it a Ponzi scheme. He cited examples of other investments that have lost more than 50% of their value this year, including Cathie Wood’s ARKK Investment, AMC Entertainment, Netflix, and LUNA.
“Most bad investments aren’t Ponzi schemes. Some are fraud, some are bad luck, and some are somewhere in between,” he said.
LUNA Draws Ire of Binance CZ
One of the major critics of Terra is Binance Changpeng Zhao who described UST as “one over-leveraged ‘stable’ coin” and criticized the design flaw of its ecosystem.
According to him, he’s disappointed in how the Terra team handled the situation. He continued that the team failed to act on any Binance requests, which included delisting the network, burning extra minted LUNA, and recovering the UST peg.
Speaking on the plan to save Terra by creating a new hard fork for LUNA, CZ thinks that won’t work saying
forking does not give the new fork any value. That’s wishful thinking. one cannot void all transactions after an old snapshot, both on-chain and off-chain (exchanges).
What do you think about this subject? Write to us and tell us!
BeInCrypto has reached out to company or individual involved in the story to get an official statement about the recent developments, but it has yet to hear back.