FTX and Three Arrows Capital (3AC) liquidators oppose BlockFi’s Motion for Entry of an Order that, in part, recharacterizes claims for the purpose of including them in a liquidation schedule.
According to FTX, BlockFi is lumping FTX claims into a Liquidation Plan instead of allowing FTX to dispute them. Disputes will require judges to “assess novel questions of law” and a “complicated factual record.”
Some Claims Between BlockFi and FTX Involve Unavailable Assets
The collapsed Bahamian exchange said BlockFi should pursue revised claims in a separate adversarial proceeding or another plan.
“This is necessary to ensure that the Court provides for a fair, appropriate, and reasonable adjudication of the FTX Claims.”
According to the objection, the fate of certain claims is tied to assets whose status will be decided at former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial in October.
Among the assets whose ownership is uncertain are 56 million Robinhood shares Bankman-Fried bought with funds borrowed from Alameda Research. Alameda Research was FTX’s primary market-maker which collapsed with the exchange last year.
Read here about decentralized crypto lenders.
Bankman-Fried also extended a $250 million revolving credit line to BlockFi after several major crypto companies collapsed last year.
Compounding BlockFi’s problems is another objection to its proposed liquidation plan from bankrupt hedge fund Three Arrows Capital.
3AC Liquidators refuse to accept BlockFi’s subordination of a $220 million loan into its liquidation plan. Their objection upholds the immunity 3AC’s US assets enjoy under Chapter 15 bankruptcy law.
SEC Files Related Disclosure Objection
In a separate filing, the US Securities and Exchange Commission argues that BlockFi did not specify the particulars of staff it wishes to release from the liability of pre-bankruptcy decisions.
“The Debtors need to provide more detailed information about such broad releases to permit affected stakeholders to make an informed decision with respect to the Plan.”
The SEC asked the court to deny approval of the Disclosure Statement Motion in the Entry Order until BlockFi sufficiently addressed these and other issues.
Last month, BlockFi’s Unsecured Creditors’ Committee accused its CEO and the debtor of enriching insiders at the expense of creditors.
Got something to say about FTX BlockFi claims or anything else? Write to us or join the discussion on our Telegram channel. You can also catch us on TikTok, Facebook, or Twitter.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
