Texas Authorizes Crypto Custody Services for Banks

Share Article
In Brief
  • The Texas Department of Banking has authorized state-chartered banks to offer customers custody services for cryptocurrencies.

  • The banking authority pointed out that an existing finance code technically already enabled such services.

  • Banks may merely hold virtual currency for the customers, or act in fiduciary capacity on their behalf.

  • promo

    BIT Launchpad: Up To 3,500 FREE BIT. Don’t Miss The Beat. Join Now!

The Trust Project is an international consortium of news organizations building standards of transparency.

The Texas Department of Banking has authorized state-chartered banks to offer customers custody services for virtual currencies.



The announcement specified that banks could do this as long as they had adequate protocols in place. It added that these protocols should effectively manage the risks and comply with the applicable laws. The banking authority also pointed out that an existing finance code technically already enabled such services.

Virtual currencies

The banking authority defined virtual currencies as “an electronic representation of value intended to be used as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, or store of value.” It also noted that they do not exist physically, but only on a blockchain or distributed ledger associated with them. 



It defined the owner of the virtual currency as the person holding the cryptographic keys for the digital wallet storing the virtual currency. This definition is important regarding the type of services banks can render to these owners. For instance, banks can allow customers to keep directly controlling their virtual currency, or merely store copies of the customer’s private keys. On the other hand, banks may require customers to transfer their virtual currency directly to the control of the bank. This would involve creating new private keys that are then held by the bank on behalf of their customer.

Fiduciary status

In regard to these custodial services, the banking authority determined that state-chartered banks can offer them in either a fiduciary or non-fiduciary capacity. For instance, in the non-fiduciary case, the bank would act as a bailee. This means that while it would possess the customer’s asset for safekeeping, legal title to that asset would remain with the customer. 

If a bank offers custody services in a fiduciary capacity, it must receive trust powers. The banking authority admits that this may require a charter amendment. Similar to other assets, banks with fiduciary authority can manage its customers’ virtual currency assets.

Finally, the banking authority takes note of the technical nature distinctive of virtual currencies versus other assets. Banks may therefore choose to supplement their custodial services with the help of service providers experienced in handling virtual currency. These banks would naturally have to provide an oversight program in relation to these external custodial service providers. This could benefit several such incumbent service providers, bolstering the local cryptocurrency industry as a whole. 


All the information contained on our website is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. Any action the reader takes upon the information found on our website is strictly at their own risk.
Share Article

Nick is a data scientist who teaches economics and communication in Budapest, Hungary, where he received a BA in Political Science and Economics and an MSc in Business Analytics from CEU. He has been writing about cryptocurrency and blockchain technology since 2018, and is intrigued by its potential economic and political usage. He can best be described as an optimistic center-left skeptic.

Follow Author

Market signals, studies and analysis! Join our Telegram Today!


Bit2Me ICO JUST STARTED! Buy B2M token now.

Buy now!

BIT Launchpad: Up To 3,500 FREE BIT. Don't Miss The Beat.

Join Now!