Trusted

ECB Wants to Change MiCA Rules, Citing Risks from Trump’s Pro-Crypto Shift

2 mins
Updated by Mohammad Shahid
Join our Trading Community on Telegram

In Brief

  • ECB expresses concern that MiCA regulations are too lenient, fearing dominance of US stablecoins in Europe.
  • The European Commission disputes these fears, suggesting the ECB's concerns serve to promote the digital euro agenda.
  • Despite MiCA's implementation, EU stablecoins remain non-competitive globally, with firms like Tether exiting Europe.
  • promo

The European Central Bank (ECB) and European Commission are having a public dispute over MiCA and stablecoin regulation. The ECB believes that restrictions aren’t harsh enough, fearing US firms dominating the market.

The Commission disputed the ECB’s fears, alleging that it’s building up stablecoin-related fears to promote a controversial digital euro program. There are already signs of European irrelevance to Web3, and more restrictions likely wouldn’t help.

ECB Thinks MiCA is Too Lenient

MiCA only took effect four months ago, but the ECB is already having serious second thoughts. According to a recent report, it is concerned about the relative competitiveness of USD stablecoins, which may take over the European market.

As one commentator, Mikko Ohtamaa, put it, it has good reasons to worry about the future:

“The EU had the first mover advantage with the regulation and they screwed it up. No EU stablecoin is internationally competitive because the inherited business unfriendliness that was baked into the MiCA by the lobbying efforts of banks and other legacy financial institutions,” he claimed via social media.

Since the EU first approached the topic of stablecoin regulations, it has profoundly impacted the region’s market. After MiCA took effect, Tether left the European market altogether.

Most recently, Ethena Labs, too, pulled out of Europe after failing to get MiCA approval. These firms had no such problems in the US.

In an interesting twist, the ECB’s concern is not that MiCA is too harsh, thereby preventing innovation. As Politico claimed, it instead worries that existing regulations aren’t strong enough.

Instead, it acknowledged President Trump’s stated goal to use stablecoins to promote dollar dominance and fears that US assets could flood European markets. It wants to fight back head-on.

This is at the heart of the controversy between these EU institutions. The European Commission reacted with hostility to the ECB’s proposed MiCA changes.

Apparently, the Commission claimed that some of its specific concerns were “nonsense,” and suggested that it was merely continuing to push for the controversial digital euro.

That is, it seems that most EU institutions are satisfied with existing stablecoin regulations. Besides, if the ECB gets its proposed MiCA reforms, would that even matter?

The crypto markets reacted with shocking ambivalence to its recent rate cuts. Europe is in danger of falling behind in the global Web3 economy, and more restrictions aren’t likely to help.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

image-10-1.png
Landon Manning
Landon Manning is a Journalist at BeInCrypto, covering a wide range of topics, including international regulation, blockchain technology, market analysis, and Bitcoin. Previously, Landon spent six years as a writer with Bitcoin Magazine and co-authored a Bitcoin maximalist newsletter with 30,000 subscribers. Landon holds a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy from Sewanee: The University of the South.
READ FULL BIO
Sponsored
Sponsored