Arguments Erupt Over Staking as Eth2 Draws Closer

Share Article
In Brief
  • As Eth2 draws closer, some disagreements about participation have emerged.

  • Developer Chase Wright published a list of reasons why he won't immediately stake ETH after the launch.

  • Although many of the potential problems Wright raises are significant, he doesn't consider them unfixable.

  • promo

    BIT Launchpad: Up To 3,500 FREE BIT. Don’t Miss The Beat. Join Now!

The Trust Project is an international consortium of news organizations building standards of transparency.

Driven by decentralized finance (DeFi) activity, the pace of transactions on Ethereum (ETH) has reached new levels, in recent months.



This has thrust the network’s scalability issues back onto center stage. As such, the crypto industry is eagerly awaiting the launch of Ethereum 2.0 (Eth2) after the Medalla testnet, which has ostensibly been making progress.

However, amidst the anticipation, there are some dissenting opinions. In a Twitter thread posted on Sept. 23, Chase Wright, an Enterprise Architect with Chicago’s Federal Reserve Bank, laid out the reasons why he won’t immediately participate in staking.



According to Wright, there are a few key reasons. First, he claims that average Medalla validators have yet to profit due to a bug in a client, “we all know that everyone is in the red due to a bug in a single client, but what happens when/if a similar bug happens on mainnet? What’s the response?”

He went on to say that none of the teams working on Eth2 have proven their ability to fix such issues, “to date there hasn’t been a single successful fork of an Eth2 beacon chain.” For Wright, this is a red flag and makes The DAO part II a matter of “not if but when.”

He continued the rant by noting that there is little interoperability between different clients and nodes and that the whole thing “wreaks of being in a rush to deliver.” There was also voiced concern about node centralization and the voting and staking rewards mechanism.

Wright’s thread garnered significant attention. In a reply, lead Ethereum developer Danny Ryan acknowledged the risks of early staking, but went to great lengths to refute many of the points.

According to Ryan, the forking issue is because “Teku and Lighthouse [clients] could not handle the stressful forking induced by the majority Prysm client. This led to extensive fixes on all clients to be able to handle such stressful scenarios.”

He also offered reassurance against the scenario repeating, “if that were to happen again today, each of those three clients is much better suited to resolve forks and build a canonical chain even if 70% of the network goes nuts.”

Regardless of any disagreement, anyone with an interest in Ethereum is hoping that by the time Beacon Chain goes live, these early teething problems will have been resolved. Wright, for his part, did ultimately concede that the problems are not necessarily fatal, “I have no doubt these issues/concerns will be worked out eventually. Nothing here is not fixable.”


All the information contained on our website is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. Any action the reader takes upon the information found on our website is strictly at their own risk.
Share Article

Colin is a writer, researcher, and content marketer with a keen interest in the future of money. His writing has been featured in numerous cryptocurrency publications, and his holdings don't amount to more than a handful of BAT.

Follow Author

Market signals, studies and analysis! Join our Telegram Today!


Bit2Me ICO JUST STARTED! Buy B2M token now.

Buy now!

BIT Launchpad: Up To 3,500 FREE BIT. Don't Miss The Beat.

Join Now!