See More

SEC Not Offering Amnesty to Self-Reporting Crypto Companies

2 mins
Updated by Ryan James
Join our Trading Community on Telegram

In Brief

  • The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will not be offering amnesty to cryptocurrency companies that self-report their violations of securities laws, according to the agency’s enforcement director.
  • The enforcement director aimed to set a precedent for companies that have persistently complained of a lack of compliance standards.
  • While amnesty is off the table, the director acknowledged that penalties may be diminished through cooperation.
  • promo

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will not be offering amnesty to cryptocurrency companies that self-report their violations of securities laws, according to the agency’s enforcement director.

“Our message to them is not, ‘Register your product and we’ll just ignore the billions you have under management in this crypto lending product and your violations of the securities laws,’” Gurbir Grewal declared. With his first public statement on crypto after being hired in July last year, the enforcement director aimed to set a precedent for companies that have persistently complained of a lack of compliance standards.

While offering some clarification, the announcement has also dashed the hopes of those in the industry who had hoped the SEC would incentivize self-reporting through an amnesty, according to attorneys. While Grewal has taken this off the table, he has acknowledged that penalties may be diminished through cooperation. 

“Our message is that we’ll view their conduct more favorably if they come in – such as what the remedies will look like, including penalties, and finding a path to complying with the securities laws,” Grewal said. “That’s the benefit entities get from self-reporting violations and working with us.”

SEC targeting crypto platforms

While many had hoped that the regulatory agency would be more cooperative with the accession of Gary Gensler as Chair, having given a course on blockchain technology at MIT, he has instead toughened its stance. He claims that many cryptocurrency products and platforms are governed by existing SEC rules, and has focused more on targeting platforms offering access to digital assets rather than coin offerings.

Earlier this month, the SEC charged a BlockFi subsidiary for offering an interest-bearing account. However, this also enabled the company to register a similar product with the SEC, which could potentially offer a road map for other companies with similar products. Last year, BlockFi competitor Coinbase Global Inc. was forced to abandon its efforts to launch a crypto-lending product following a public spat with the SEC.

What do you think about this subject? Write to us and tell us!

Top crypto projects in the US | April 2024

Trusted

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

photo_Nick.jpg
Nicholas Pongratz
Nick is a data scientist who teaches economics and communication in Budapest, Hungary, where he received a BA in Political Science and Economics and an MSc in Business Analytics from CEU. He has been writing about cryptocurrency and blockchain technology since 2018, and is intrigued by its potential economic and political usage.
READ FULL BIO
Sponsored
Sponsored