Attacking Hardware Wallets: An Inexpensive Affair?The research team said that once a Trezor hardware wallet lands in the possession of a hypothetical attacker, they would be able to retrieve the master seed protected by the wallet quite easily unless the user had the presence of mind to set a strong passphrase. The researchers also found that the vulnerability could not be eradicated without a complete hardware overhaul of the wallet. When the research team notified Trezor about the potential of a physical attack on their wallet, Trezor said that the attack was too specialized, unrealistic, and hard to reproduce. Part of the company’s dismissal of the claim was that disruption of the hardware security of the wallet would require expensive equipment. The research team then set out to learn whether or not the physical security of the hardware wallet could be compromised with only limited resources. To achieve this, they redesigned the attack with inexpensive tools that can be easily obtained. A compact electrical board worth around $100 was designed to extract the master seed from the wallet within five minutes. This board can be connected to any computer with a simple USB cable.
Unfixable Seed Extraction on Trezor: A practical and reliable attack— Ledger Donjon (@DonjonLedger) July 3, 2019
"An attacker with a stolen device can extract the seed from the device. It takes less than 5 minutes and the necessary materials cost around 100$."https://t.co/i6F1P7T9nY pic.twitter.com/pMSF3nHC8r
Remedy Against Physical AttacksThe research team noted that users can prevent such attacks by adopting proper mitigation measures. This includes setting a long and complicated passphrase, making brute force attempts significantly more difficult for inexpensive homebrew hardware. The research team recommended users to set up a passphrase comprising of thirty-seven random characters to ensure complete security. In response to the findings of the research team, Trezor added that its main focus was to protect users against remote security attacks. Trezor reaffirmed the need to set a strong passphrase to guarantee security against any physical attacks to the hardware wallet. With the information provided by the research team at Ledger, do you think hardware wallet manufacturers should do more to protect users from physical attacks? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
All the information contained on our website is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. Any action the reader takes upon the information found on our website is strictly at their own risk.