See More

Bitcoin Climate Impact Could Be Offset by ‘Green Choices’

2 mins
Updated by Kyle Baird
Join our Trading Community on Telegram

In Brief

  • Blockchain for Climate Foundation founder Joseph Pallant said “green choices” could offset Bitcoin’s climate impact.
  • One suggestion was using renewable energy to power bitcoin mining.
  • Another suggestion was buying carbon credits to offset Bitcoin’s carbon footprint.
  • promo

Blockchain for Climate Foundation founder Joseph Pallant encourages “green choices” to offset the impact of the Bitcoin network’s carbon footprint.

Speaking with Bloomberg about how to temper the environmental impact of cryptocurrencies, Pallant contrasted Ethereum and Bitcoin. First, he highlighted Ethereum’s migration to a less taxing proof-of-stake consensus mechanism over the next year. This could drive Ethereum’s carbon footprint down to near zero. “That’s why we’re very comfortable using it for our work at the Blockchain for Climate Foundation,” he said.

However, with Bitcoin, he emphasized that it would not be using proof-of-stake. Ripple co-found Chris Larsen, recently wrote that Bitcoin’s energy-intensive proof-of-work mechanism could threaten the overall growing adoption of crypto. Because of this, mitigating Bitcoin’s impact would require other tools, Pallant continued.

Offsetting Bitcoin environmental impact

Because Bitcoin lacks plans to mitigate the burden of its proof-of-work consensus mechanism, Pallant suggested making “green choices.” For instance, using renewable energy as an energy source for bitcoin mining. Canadian company Digihost recently announced that over 50% of the energy for its mining operations came from renewable energy sources.

Another suggestion he posed was purchasing carbon credits to offset Bitcoin’s carbon footprint. He highlighted another Canadian company, NinePoint, which offers a Bitcoin ETF. NinePoint is working with Carbon X to calculate the impact of the bitcoin in its ETF and purchase credits to offset it.

Pallant emphasized that potential investors understanding the environmental impact of their individual choices would be key for facilitating a “cleaner bitcoin.” He added that incentivizing miners to share data about their carbon footprint could go a long way in this regard. Although, “they’re notoriously hard to get to share data because they really need their privacy,” Pallant admitted.

Despite the reticence in sharing data, the Blockchain for Climate Foundation executive director cited widely accepted estimates of crypto’s climate impact. He mentioned a study from Cambridge University, which put Bitcoin’s carbon footprint at around 40-48 million tons of carbon emissions per year. Tesla CEO Elon Musk cited this same study when he announced that the company would no longer accept bitcoin payments. 

Meanwhile, Pallant added that Ethereum’s impact amounts to 12 million tons per year. However, he concluded that Ethereum’s transition to proof-of-stake would likely lead to the footprint’s neutralization.

Top crypto projects in the US | April 2024
Harambe AI Harambe AI Explore →
Coinbase Coinbase Explore →
Chain GPT Chain GPT Explore →
iTrustCapital iTrustCapital Explore →

Trusted

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

photo_Nick.jpg
Nicholas Pongratz
Nick is a data scientist who teaches economics and communication in Budapest, Hungary, where he received a BA in Political Science and Economics and an MSc in Business Analytics from CEU. He has been writing about cryptocurrency and blockchain technology since 2018, and is intrigued by its potential economic and political usage.
READ FULL BIO
Sponsored
Sponsored