Initially, CZ seemed to support this idea but has noted that network reorganization might lead to unwanted consequences. Furthermore, experts including co-founder of Bitmain Jihan Wu weighed in the issue. One argument against the rollback cited damage to Bitcoin credibility. Another held that a rollback could create a potential split within the community. At the end of the day, CZ decided not to push forward with the “re-org.”@cz_binance if you reveal your private keys for the hacked coins (or a subset of them) you can decentralized-ly at zero cost to you, coordinate a reorg to undo the theft.
— Jeremy Rubin (@JeremyRubin) May 8, 2019
Do you think the re-org might have been a viable option? Or is it a toxic idea that kills credibility? Let us know what you think in the comments below.After speaking with various parties, including @JeremyRubin, @_prestwich, @bcmakes, @hasufl, @JihanWu and others, we decided NOT to pursue the re-org approach. Considerations being:
— CZ Binance (@cz_binance) May 8, 2019
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.