A grand total of 1 Bitcoin (BTC) was traded on Bakkt during the first quarter of Thursday. The forecast for the day at the time was hovering around 5 BTC, adding fresh fodder for skeptics to mock the pre-launch hype the ICE subsidiary had created.
The records have improved marginally since with the volume subsequently going up to 20 BTC midway through the day, although the broader trend of a subpar performance persists.
Barely Hitting a Daily Average of $500k
Bulls counting on Bakkt to take BTC price to new highs were pleasantly surprised on Oct 9 after it registered an all-time-high interday figure of 224 contracts, up a whopping 800% compared to the day prior, as BeInCrypto has previously reported. The joy was short-lived, though, as the volume dipped more than 51% to 109 contracts on Oct 10 and then slipped further 46% the next day. The trend has remained more or less the same since then, with monthly futures worth around $500k being traded on average per day.There’s no sure shot way to pinpoint to what fueled the sudden spike on Oct 9. In all likelihood, Bitcoin’s own price movement played a part in it, considering that the asset has surged about $400 to $8,600 per unit on the previous day.Wednesday's Bakkt Bitcoin Monthly Futures:
— Bakkt Volume Bot (@BakktBot) October 17, 2019
💸 Traded contracts: 59 (-25%)
📉 Day before: 79
🚀 All time high: 224
*bleep blop* tip sats: https://t.co/TF6sNUwWpO 🤖 pic.twitter.com/xxvHGw1Wn9
Institutional Interest Is up Despite Bakkt’s Subpar Performance
Expectations were high ever since the Intercontinental Exchange announced last year that it was planning on launching a platform for physically-settled Bitcoin futures contracts. It was a first-of-its-kind offering, after all — quite unlike any of the previously launched cash-settled BTC futures contracts.
Why is Bakkt Underperforming?
So why has Bakkt failed miserably so far to take off as expected despite growing institutional interest? Well, as BeInCrypto had reported earlier, one plausible factor at play could be Bakkt’s uniqueness in the sense that it offers physical delivery of Bitcoin. Analysts such as Alex Kruger are of the view that most institutional investors aren’t yet ready to cozy up to physically-settled contracts — especially when it comes to Bitcoin or other digital currencies which generally tend to be volatile and highly speculative.Meanwhile, it is also possible that the hype surrounding Bakkt was a little overblown right from the start considering that it is offering a speculative product that’s more suited towards making an incremental impact. Do you see Bakkt improving its stats in the weeks ahead, considering that institutional interest in the asset class is still on the way? Share your thoughts in the comments below.In finance, 98% of futures are not physically settled as traders do not want to take delivery, even for physically settled contracts.
— Alex Krüger (@krugermacro) September 24, 2019
=> comparing Bakkt with the CME is perfectly fine, particularly so with Bakkt's monthly contract.
Images are courtesy of Twitter, Shutterstock.
Disclaimer
All the information contained on our website is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. Any action the reader takes upon the information found on our website is strictly at their own risk.
Sponsored
Sponsored