Miles Jennings, the head of decentralization at venture capital firm a16z, sees the application of Machiavellian principles to decentralized governance in Web3 as a potential solution to address its current limitations.
“Web3 should triumph over web2 because web3 enables decentralization; decentralization reduces censorship and promotes liberty,” Jennings noted.
Utilizing Machiavellian Principles in Decentralized Governance
Jennings outlines the Machiavellian principles as guidelines for designing more robust and effective decentralized governance.
In a recent report, he delivers a comprehensive explanation of the concepts, with the first highlighting the significance of reducing governance.
The second idea involves the creation of a well-balanced leadership group that remains open to constant challenges and opposition. Additionally, it aims to establish a framework for the ongoing rotation of leadership and enhance the overall transparency and responsibility within this leadership cohort.
He clarified that the principle behind governance minimization is to keep it as straightforward as possible:
“DAOs can take advantage of the incentivized decentralization model to combat such trends and drive further governance minimization.”
Striving for Balance in Governance Structure
Jennings also notes that the governance should be delegated.
He believes that token holders should act as a check on the power of the stakeholders.
“Because the livelihood of the stakeholders is ultimately dependent on the protocol, they are much more likely to take the governance of the protocol seriously than good actors who are simply participating in decentralized governance out of a spirit of civic duty.”
He provides an example of how a governance structure might take shape.
This example clarifies that the stakeholder council could consist of the following groups: the operators of the four highest transaction volume clients, the creators of the four leading third-party products and services, and the top four sellers.
He further argues that the leadership class divides and organizes their voting power into three separate series. Each will be aligned with specific constituencies. The leadership class collectively exercises their voting authority as a unified council.
Angie Malltezi, CSO of Web3 startup Shipyard Software, emphasized to BeInCrypto on August 29 that regulation poses a significant obstacle for DAOs.
She underscores the difficulty in ascertaining a DAO’s location, intentions, and its operational behavior as some of the foremost challenges.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
