Tracking the origin of this $1B is tricky at best. According to lowstrife (@lowstrife), the BTC came from dozens of wallets. Interestingly enough, all the former wallets still seem to be active. Some are also speculating that a few of the larger wallets the BTC originated are alleged to be linked to Huobi addresses. Many of the addresses also originate from 2015. If the address is not exchange-related it would stand as the largest amount in any off-exchange address and regardless is the fifth overall wealthiest.🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 94,504 #BTC (1,018,147,922 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to unknown wallet
— Whale Alert (@whale_alert) September 6, 2019
Tx: https://t.co/VWb8slswa8
Also, you can only imagine how much the individual who clicked ‘send’ for 94,504 BTC must have felt. He surely must have double-checked that address at least 20 times. https://twitter.com/Obstropolos/status/1169850163256446978 The fees for the entire $1B transaction were just a few hundred dollars. That’s staggeringly low, which further indicates the strength of the Bitcoin network. Bitcoin is virtually the only decentralized network in which moving $1B is conceivable. Overall, it’s unclear whether this mind-blowing BTC transfer will affect markets. By all estimates, it just seems to be a very wealthy individual consolidating their holdings into one address. While not a true indicator of anything particular, it at the very least indicates that major players are making moves in the background. Since the transfer, Bitcoin has appreciated slightly and is now trading at the $10,700 price point. For future reference, it may be smart to keep an eye on this address — any movements from it may indicate some serious market turbulence is coming. Have you ever seen a Bitcoin transfer this large before? Let us know your thoughts below in the comments. Buy and trade cryptocurrencies with a 100x multiplier on our partner exchange, StormGain.As others have said, these big wallets seem to be Huobi addresses. They're tagged as such on https://t.co/E6dgp2JdWR at least.
— lowstrife (@lowstrife) September 6, 2019
The ones I've looked at seem to be active from 2015 until the start of 2017.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.