Trusted

Safe Wallet Confirms Role in $1.5 Billion Bybit Hack Amid Industry Criticism

2 mins
Updated by Ann Maria Shibu
Join our Trading Community on Telegram

In Brief

  • Safe Wallet confirms hackers exploited its infrastructure in the Bybit breach, though smart contracts remained secure.
  • Despite reassurances, Safe Wallet faces criticism for vague explanations, with industry leaders questioning security handling.
  • FBI confirms Lazarus Group's involvement in the attack, tracking stolen 40,000 ETH and warning of ongoing laundering activities.
  • promo

The fallout from the recent $1.5 billion Bybit hack continues to unfold as Safe Wallet confirms that hackers exploited its infrastructure. 

The attack reportedly originated from a compromised developer machine and involved a disguised malicious transaction that facilitated unauthorized access.

Safe Wallet Targeted in $1.5 Billion Bybit Hack

In an official statement, Safe Wallet clarified that its smart contracts were not compromised in the attack.

“The forensic review of external security researchers did NOT indicate any vulnerabilities in the Safe smart contracts or source code of the frontend and services,” the post read.

In response to the breach, Safe Wallet has restored its services on the Ethereum (ETH) mainnet through a phased rollout. The team claims to have completely rebuilt and reconfigured its infrastructure while rotating all credentials to prevent future exploits. 

Despite the reassurances, users have been urged to exercise extreme caution when signing transactions as Safe Wallet implements additional security measures. 

The company also announced an industry-wide initiative to improve transaction verifiability across the ecosystem. Lastly, a full post-mortem report is expected once the investigation concludes.

Despite the reassurances, Safe Wallet’s explanation has not been well-received by members of the crypto community. Many users, including prominent industry figures, have criticized it as insufficient and vague. 

One of the most vocal critics is Changpeng Zhao (CZ). The former CEO of Binance expressed doubts about Safe Wallet’s handling of the situation.

“I usually try not to criticize other industry players, but I still do it once in a while. This update from Safe is not that great. It uses vague language to brush over the issues. I have more questions than answers after reading it,” he stated.

Among his concerns, CZ questioned the security of the developer machine, the deployment of code to Bybit’s production environment, and how the hackers were able to bypass Ledger verification steps. He also inquired why the breach targeted Bybit’s address rather than others managed by Safe Wallet.

Another analyst advocated for stronger security management. He confirmed that while the smart contract layer was intact, the attack had tampered with the front end. This enabled the hackers to manipulate transactions. 

The analyst described this as a classic supply chain attack and warned that all user-interactive services involving frontends, APIs, and similar infrastructure could be at risk.

“The security management model for huge/large assets needs a major upgrade,” he remarked.

FBI Confirms Lazarus Group Behind Bybit Hack

Last week, hackers stole 40,000 ETH from Bybit’s cold wallet. Initially, reports suggested that the North Korean Lazarus Group carried out the attack, and now the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has confirmed their involvement.

The public service announcement has identified the operation as “TraderTraitor.”

“TraderTraitor actors are proceeding rapidly and have converted some of the stolen assets to Bitcoin and other virtual assets dispersed across thousands of addresses on multiple blockchains. It is expected these assets will be further laundered and eventually converted to fiat currency,” the announcement read.

The agency has also listed Ethereum addresses tied to the group. Furthermore, it has urged virtual asset service providers, including exchanges, blockchain analytics firms, and decentralized finance (DeFi) services, to block transactions connected to the addresses involved in the laundering efforts.

Best crypto platforms in Europe
YouHodler YouHodler Explore
Wirex Wirex Explore
eToro eToro Explore
BingX BingX Explore
Best crypto platforms in Europe
YouHodler YouHodler Explore
Wirex Wirex Explore
eToro eToro Explore
BingX BingX Explore
Best crypto platforms in Europe
OKX OKX
YouHodler YouHodler
Wirex Wirex
eToro eToro
BingX BingX

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

kamina.bashir.png
Kamina Bashir
Kamina is a journalist at BeInCrypto, where she writes about all things crypto—think market trends, blockchain technology, regulatory shifts, and emerging trends in the digital asset world. With a gold medal in MBA International Business and extensive experience, she brings both expertise and clarity to her reporting. Previously at AMBCrypto, Kamina was responsible for writing and editing in-depth analyses, price predictions, AI and crypto blogs, and breaking news. She’s passionate about...
READ FULL BIO
Sponsored
Sponsored