United States Prosecutors have alleged that there may be a conflict of interest over the fact that former CEO of now-defunct crypto exchange FTX Sam Bankman-Fried and bankrupt crypto lending platform CEO Alex Mashinsky have the same lawyers.
The prosecutors highlight that Celsius positions itself as a victim of Alameda Research. This only intensifies the entanglement between the two cases.
SponsoredFTX and Celsius Defendants Share Lawyers
In a court filing, US prosecutors declare that lawyers Marc Mukasey and Torrey Young represent both Bankman-Fried and Mashinsky, which may present conflicts of interest.
âMr. Mukaseyâs and Ms. Youngâs representation of defendants Bankman-Fried and Mashinsky in separate cases creates a potential conflict of interest; this potential conflict of interest, however, is waivable.â
Concerns are being raised because there is coloration between the two firms that each individual they are representing founded respectively. Mashinsky has at times blamed the fall of Celsius âon actions taken by Alameda Research,â including price manipulation of CEL.
Read more: Who Is Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the Infamous FTX Co-Founder?
Furthermore, prosecutors claim biases could arise as theyâre restricted in sharing information with both parties despite viewing documents from both firms.
SponsoredâThird, in this case, defense counsel has gained access to millions of records pursuant to a protective order, which will limit defense counselâs use and disclosure of that information. That too creates the potential for conflict.â
Additionally, prior to Celsiusâs bankruptcy, Bankman-Fried discussed Celsiusâs financial condition with its executives. There were talks of FTX purchasing Celsius, with Bankman-Fried possibly replacing Mashinsky as CEO.
Prosecutors Say SBF and Alex Mashinsky Situation is âNot Severeâ
The prosecutors allege that Bankman-Friedâs involvement during this period might provide relevant information for Mashinskyâs defense. However, the lawyers arenât authorized to share it with Mashinsky.
However, the prosecutors asserted that the severity is not significant but can be reduced by adding another counsel.
Read more: FTXÂ Collapse Explained: How Sam Bankman-Friedâs Empire Fell
Bankman-Friedâs parents recently claimed that they had no knowledge of the illicit actions of their sonâs exchange. This was in an effort to dismiss the lawsuit against them.
On January 17, BeInCrypto reported that Bankman-Friedâs parentsâ lawyers declared that they never occupied a directorial or any executive position at the now-defunct crypto exchange FTX or Alameda Research.