A bloc of House Republicans is threatening to sink a bipartisan Senate housing package unless lawmakers replace a temporary restriction on a US central bank digital currency (CBDC) with a permanent ban.
The dispute centers on the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, released last week by the Senate Banking Committee. The bill would temporarily bar the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC, but that restriction would expire on December 31, 2030.
Why Are These Lawmakers Insisting on a Permanent CBDC Ban?
However, that sunset clause has drawn opposition from an 18-member group of House Republicans.
The lawmakers warned that they will ensure the Senate measure is “dead on arrival” in the House unless lawmakers strengthen the anti-CBDC provision.
Their argument is rooted in privacy and civil liberties concerns. The group says a CBDC would hand “unelected bureaucrats” a mechanism for financial surveillance that could exceed constitutional limits.
They argue that a government-run digital ledger could track transactions, restrict disfavored activity, or even cut citizens off from the financial system.
“A CBDC is essentially a digital dollar issued and controlled by the Federal Reserve. Unlike cash, it could allow the government to track transactions and monitor how Americans spend their money,” Reps. Ralph Norman wrote on X, formerly Twitter.
Due to this, the lawmakers are demanding the inclusion of the stricter language from Majority Whip Tom Emmer’s Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (H.R. 1919).
That bill, which previously passed the House, would go beyond a temporary restriction. It would impose a permanent ban on a retail digital dollar and also bar the Federal Reserve from launching pilot programs or studying the underlying technology.
“The House already passed legislation to permanently ban a CBDC. The Senate must amend the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act with STRONGER language before sending any bill to the House. A permanent prohibition is the ONLY way to protect Americans’ privacy and liberty,” Norman added.
Meanwhile, the lawmakers also said they are frustrated by delays from House leadership.
According to the group, the speaker had earlier pledged during negotiations over cryptocurrency and stablecoin legislation to attach a permanent CBDC ban to must-pass measures. They said those commitments have yet to materialize eight months later.
The clash highlights a wider policy split over how the US should respond to state-backed digital currency efforts abroad.
Critics of a permanent ban argue that such a step would put Washington on a different path from other major economies, including China and the euro zone.
Indeed, the People’s Bank of China is actively deploying its digital yuan, while the European Central Bank is advancing work on a digital euro.
