Back

Why Iran’s Top War Operator Suddenly Sounds Very American

Prefer us on Google
sameAuthor avatar

Written & Edited by
Mohammad Shahid

02 April 2026 17:06 UTC
  • Ghalibaf’s X posts now use American political and market language.
  • No proof he’s posting from the US, despite online speculation.
  • Shift points to targeted wartime messaging, not personal posting.
Promo

Speculation is growing online that Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, may be posting on X with help from inside the United States. 

The theory stems from unusually polished English posts, US-focused messaging, and an account label showing “connected via the US App Store.” Some users claim the tone feels “too American” to be organic.

Sponsored
Sponsored

However, there is no clear evidence that the account is run from the US or by Americans. The App Store label can reflect device settings or routing, not physical location. 

American commentators are overstating these details. X settings show that Ghalibaf’s account was most likely accessed via an iPhone using a US-region Apple ID, or a VPN / routing setup

So, it doesn’t prove physical presence in the US.

What is clear is the messaging itself has changed.

Ghalibaf, a former IRGC commander and now a central political figure in Iran’s wartime leadership, has begun speaking directly to American audiences. 

Sponsored
Sponsored

He references gas prices, economic hardship, and political decisions in Washington. His posts increasingly mirror US political language and online culture.

At the same time, he has made comments that resemble market commentary. In one example, he suggested investors should interpret political signals as indicators of market direction. 

These posts stop short of financial advice but frame the war through economic consequences.

This shift aligns with a broader strategy. Iranian officials are using English-language posts to shape foreign public opinion during the conflict. 

By focusing on economic pain and market reactions, Ghalibaf’s messaging makes the war feel immediate to US audiences.

The bigger story may not be where the posts come from, but why they sound this way. Ghalibaf is not just acting as a political figure in the war. 

He is operating in the information space, where influence over perception can matter as much as actions on the ground.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

Sponsored
Sponsored