See More

VanEck and ProShares Back Out of ETH Futures ETF Filings

2 mins
Updated by Ryan James
Join our Trading Community on Telegram

In Brief

  • VanEck and ProShares both withdrew their applications only two days after submitting.
  • VanEck has other ETFs under review with the SEC.
  • SEC currently has more than a dozen BTC-related ETFs on its radar; it is yet to approve a single one.
  • promo

Asset management companies VanEck and ProShares have withdrawn their filings for Ether (ETH) futures exchange traded funds (ETFs).

They both amended their respective applications with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) only days after the initial filings. Both firms applied to launch ETH-based ETFs on August 18. However, by August 20, the companies requested to back out. At time of press, neither firm had given a reason as to their withdrawal.

In both amended applications, the companies stipulated that no securities had been sold in connection with them. VanEck’s statement also said that “the Trust has determined not to proceed with the offering of this series at this time.”

In VanEck’s case, the ETH ETF, officially named the VanEck Ethereum Strategy ETF, was not their only fund currently before the SEC. This year, they have filed with the regulator for bitcoin (BTC)- and ETH-centered ETFs. Also, back in June, the company submitted a BTC futures strategy prospectus to the SEC, so as to approve a BTC strategy fund. In all cases, the SEC has yet to issue approval, with deadlines continually postponed.

ETH no longer a viable option?

VanEck and ProShares’ decisions have provoked comment about ETH’s viability as an ETF option. Eric Balchunas, Senior ETF Analyst at Bloomberg, took to Twitter to remark at VanEck’s withdrawal, saying:

“Looks like VanEck withdrawing their Ether Futures ETF that they filed only two days ago. Guessing the. [sic] SEC called them up and was like GTFOH (in so many words).”

After ProShares’ own withdrawal came to light, Balchunas followed up, tweeting:

“Now ProShares is withdrawing their Ether ETF filing. SEC may have had a conf [sic] call, Godfather-style. Ether, you’re out.”

As long we ONLY see the Ether ones ejected, I’d say that’s decent news for bitcoin ETF,” the analyst went on. “Sort of like them saying, look, let’s baby step this, only bitcoin rn [sic].”

There is no shortage of BTC-related ETFs before the SEC at the moment. More than a dozen, in fact, though the regulator is yet to approve a single one. SEC Chair Gary Gensler previously stated he would look forward to ETF filings and SEC staff’s reviews thereof. “…Particularly if those [filings] are limited to these CME-traded Bitcoin futures.” 

Meanwhile, another asset management firm, Neuberger Berman, side-lined ETH futures in favor of BTC for investment options in its latest regulatory filing. Reports from August 21 revealed that the company had permitted its commodities mutual fund to invest up to 5% of its assets in BTC futures and other ETFs based in Canada. The filing replaced another, made on August 11, which listed ETH derivatives among the permissible investment strategies. These derivatives were not present in the amended filing.

Top crypto projects in the US | June 2024

Trusted

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

b47a748af8d2b4e808dcef82f9abd0ec?s=120&d=mm&r=g
Dale Hurst
Dale Hurst is a journalist, presenter, and novelist. Before joining the Be In Crypto team, he was an editor and senior journalist at a news, lifestyle and human-interest magazine in the UK. Cryptocurrency was one of the first subjects he specialized in when first going freelance in 2018, reviewing exchanges and analysing lawsuits.
READ FULL BIO
Sponsored
Sponsored