Lido’s dominance in the Ethereum staking market should raise serious concerns about Ethereum’s centralization, say the heads of the decentralized autonomous organization Asymmetry Finance. The potential impact of centralization on Ethereum could be catastrophic, leading to market crashes and protocol failures. Will regulators and community members wake up in time?
Since the Bitcoin Whitepaper in 2008, decentralization has been the dream and driving force behind cryptocurrency. However, like many good things, it is easier said than done. Ethereum’s upgrade to proof-of-stake (PoS) last year brought many benefits. But, if you ask many in the liquid staking community, it also had serious downsides. Although, to first understand the problem, you need to understand Lido (LDO).
What Is Lido?
Lido (LDO) solves one of the biggest issues with staking tokens on a PoS blockchain like Ethereum: illiquidity. Essentially, in traditional staking, your tokens become locked up in the staking process—the consensus mechanism that secures the blockchain.
Instead of completely locking up your crypto assets, liquid staking allows you to receive tokenized versions of your deposited funds.
Launched in 2020, Lido supports Ethereum 2.0 liquid staking, as well as other layer-1 PoS blockchains like Solana, and Polkadot. Lido makes staking on Ethereum easier by allowing users to stake smaller amounts of Ether and still earn rewards. However, the minimum barrier for staking Ethereum is 32ETH (or about $60,000 at the time of writing).
An intimidating amount of money, to be sure. Although Lido Finance presents a solution. It lowers the financial barrier to staking ETH by enabling users to pool their ETH and stake any amount. So what’s the problem?
The Centralization of Ethereum Staking
Unfortunately, Lido’s popularity has been a double-edged sword. It dominates the Ethereum ecosystem’s liquid staking derivatives and raises concerns about its impact on Ethereum’s decentralization as it experiences rapid and exponential growth. Even Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s founder and mastermind, has acknowledged the risk it poses.
“Lido running 38% of validators is more than double that of which Vitalik said is too much for any single entity to control,” Justin Garland, co-founder of Asymmetry Finance, said in a discussion with BeInCrypto.
“Additionally, only 18% of ETH is currently staked. In Solana, more than 80% of the native token supply is staked and securing the network. In Avalanche, that number is above 60%. More ETH must be staked, as it further secures the entire network.”
Asymmetry was founded to address the centralization of the Liquid staking tokens and derivatives market. When you deposit into Asymmetry, you receive a share of multiple staked Ethereum derivatives, which helps decentralize the staked Ethereum market. They plan to launch their flagship product afETH in the fall of this year.
One Attack Away From Disaster
Should the centralization vis-a-vis Lido keep you up at night? If you build or operate on Ethereum, maybe. For Hannah Hamilton, Asymmetry Finance’s other co-founder, the potential outcome is catastrophic.
“[It] means mass chaos. Crash of markets. Potentially the loss of everything that is on Ethereum. DeFi protocol failure for those integrated with Lido. It would be the worst crash within DeFi we’ve ever seen – nearly incomprehensible,” Hamilton told BeInCrypto.
“One protocol’s failure should not ever be allowed to obtain enough reach such that it would have an impact of this magnitude on the entire industry. This is why it is imperative that we decentralize this market,” she added.
It’s not entirely clear that everyone understands these risks, added Garland. Which calls for more education on what exactly decentralization means in practice.
“To note, 66% of the nodes on the Ethereum network must agree on the state of the network to reach consensus,” Garland explained.
“According to Rated Network, Lido has 32.9% ‘network penetration’ or the amount of stake that maps under one entity. Meaning if Lido gets to 33% and there was an attack or bug, Lido could single handedly stop the Ethereum network from reaching consensus. This means Ethereum itself stops functioning properly.”
Having too many validators on Ethereum isn’t the solution either, added Hamilton.
“The validator set would become messy and individuals are more likely to get slashed historically than market-leading validators. Thus, an ecosystem with a larger number of market leading validators (not just Lido, but a more even split among Lido, Rocketpool, Ankr, Stakewise, etc.) that have good infrastructure set up for secure validating, but also with none of them dominating the market,” she stated.
Regulators Remain Ignorant
It can be a struggle to get legislators with a non-financial background to understand the intricacies of centralized finance (or CeFi). So how to tackle the steep learning curve with DeFi and Ethereum staking?
US regulators certainly don’t understand these risks, or any others in the crypto ecosystem, continued Hamilton. “Additionally, we don’t think they yet understand that DeFi solves many problems that currently threaten the traditional financial system. For example, the numerous defaulted loans and credit risk contagion we’ve seen in CeFi simply cannot happen within DeFi.”
She continued: “On Aave, the decentralized lending platform, no loans were defaulted on because they can’t be. The smart contracts don’t allow it. If you’re undercollateralized, your position is liquidated because that is what the smart contract dictates. We need this transparency in all financial markets.”
Following the Trust Project guidelines, this feature article presents opinions and perspectives from industry experts or individuals. BeInCrypto is dedicated to transparent reporting, but the views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of BeInCrypto or its staff. Readers should verify information independently and consult with a professional before making decisions based on this content.